Wednesday, August 27, 2014

New Series: Random Things To Inspire

by Lara Sanderson


Hi All,
So this a random series, posted at random times, about random yet postgrad related stuff. It came about because I keep happening on a plethora of resources that may or may not be useful to other people - especially for presentations and/or posters. Some make take a little imagination to think how or when you might like to use the resource or they may simply sit in your consciousness till one day someone asks you a question and you have that "aha!" moment. I'm kinda like the resource Ninja - I pounced when you weren't looking and wrestled you to the ground like this baby bear! Which segues nicely to my first resource website which is actually an online journal that has collated many of the public domain collections in one easy to access site The Public Domain Review.

The Public Domain Review has tapped into many museum collections including the UK National Archives and subsequently their time line for material spans pre 16th Century right up to the 20th Century all of which have fallen out of copyright ergo available to use*. Excitingly they have multimedia content from images and films, to audio for you to explore! Including some cheeky GIFS like the first ever kiss caught on film! Saucy!
 
As part of the collection every fortnight they share long essays written by postgrads and scholars alike on various themes like the smile in portraits. This provides hours of interesting and stimulating reading - great for random bits of knowledge that may be useful in a pub quiz or to inspire you along your research journey. 


“All the effort in the world won't matter if you're not inspired.”
― Chuck Palahniuk, Diary

*make sure to check how you can use the materials e.g. modifiable.



Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Who is... Dr Keryn Pratt?

Today we have a guest post from Dr Keryn Pratt, UOCE Postgraduate Coordinator, and woman of many hats. Keryn has (obviously) completed her PhD, supervises students, and examines theses. Keryn introduces herself and offers some useful tips for the postgrad journey.

Dr. Keryn Pratt


As I write this post, I’m wearing a number of hats. The first, from the point of view of my involvement in this blog, is my hat as Doctoral & Distance coordinator for the College of Education.  In this role I hold overall responsibility for all postgraduate (non-initial teacher education) and distance matters within the College, reporting to the Associate Dean (Research), Prof Jeff Smith. As the name would suggest, I’m the first port of call for all doctoral matters, while my colleague, Dr. Darrell Latham, as Masters Coordinator, takes the lead with Masters students. I’ve been in this role (or a variation) since 2010 and am working to ensure we have a vibrant research student community within the College, plus are supporting our many distance students.

The second hat I wear is as a thesis supervisor. I currently supervise a number of doctoral students - but no masters students - they all graduated! My research areas are in ICT and distance education, so most of my students are in this area, although I do supervise across a wide range of areas, as appropriate. As I was originally trained as a quantitative researcher I’m often called on for input in Quant aspects of mixed methods research. This is great, as it means I get to learn about a whole heap of different areas of educational research.

My third hat is that of a lecturer. While there are - obviously - no lectures involved at the thesis level, I teach in the course our EdD students complete prior to beginning their thesis studies, plus all my current teaching is at the postgrad level, so I’ve had many of our current thesis students in one or other of my classes. Some of you have managed to escape though . . . but I don’t take it personally :)

My fourth hat (I told you I had a number!) is that of a PhD examiner. While I haven’t examined a huge number of theses (not including the one I should be doing instead of writing this I’ve done 7 doctoral and seven masters theses, and 24 masters dissertations), I have learned what this examiner, at least, is looking for!

The final hat I wear is an ex PhD student. While my PhD was completed a scarily long time ago (I graduated in 2000), and through a different department (Psychology) I still remember some of the pain joy of the process. I’ve shared some of my ‘pearls of wisdom’ with a number of our current and past students - and while I don’t think completing one doctorate gives anyone the ‘right’ answer, did learn some lessons which I’m happy to talk about with anyone, in case they are of value to them too!

But this has got much longer than planned, so it’s time to stop. I thought I’d end with a few points to keep in mind as you travel this exciting, frustrating, confusing, wonderful, boring, exhilarating, unique road. These are things I’ve found useful - but feel free to ignore them and find your own tips/shortcuts etc.

1.    Remember the point of your doctorate. It’s not to change/save the world - it’s to pass! While how you do that is through adding knowledge, it’s important to remember that this is just the first step on a journey, and keep your examiners in mind - always. It’s not enough that you think the information is important - they’ve got to think it too!

2.    Remember the focus of your doctorate. It’s very easy to get sidetracked - both in your reading and your writing. While you do need to read widely at least initially, you have to stop reading (or at least restrict it) at some stage. I ended up putting my research question immediately above my desk, so that every time I glanced up from what I was reading/writing I immediately saw it, and asked myself whether what I was doing was addressing the research question. If it wasn’t, I put it aside for my research life post-PhD.

3.   Have somewhere to save bits you cut from your thesis, and to record things you want to read/think about later. I found it incredibly hard to just delete those sentences, paragraphs and sometimes (sob!) pages that I’d worked so hard on. Somehow, copying them to another file, that I could ‘come back to later’ made it so much better. Did I come back to them . . . well no, but it did at least stop me leaving it all in for the poor examiner to read!

4.    Reference endlessly . . .I know you think you’ll remember where you got that article, chapter etc, or that quote, the idea you just noted - but you might not . . .and you don’t want to spend hours going back through articles looking for where you found it. (Ok, so I did write my thesis in the days before electronic articles, but it’s still an issue).

5.  The little things do matter. Your formatting needs to be easy to read and consistent, your referencing needs to be correct, and if you say you are going to do a, b and c - then don’t do a, c and b. It can be very off-putting for an examiner - and you want to keep them in a good mood! I would recommend getting your formatting/heading styles sorted early, and then use them for anything related to your thesis - it makes formatting at the end so much less stressful. If you find you’re getting to the stage where you can’t be bothered checking the line spacing under that heading, or whether you’ve used that reference before (and so should say et al rather than listing all the authors) - it’s time to do something else for a while.

6.    Work out your timeline - and then ensure you’ve allowed time for things to go wrong. If you want to finish in 3.5 years, aim to finish in 3 - worst case you’ll finish early (apparently this does happen . . .!), more likely you’ll be able to finish on time, once that chapter/ finding participants /getting ethics takes longer than you planned. On that note, don’t do a 2.5 year longitudinal study if you want to finish within 3 years! I know, self-evident now . . .but somehow I missed that when I started!

7.    When your supervisor (or anyone else) criticises your thesis, it’s a good thing . . .honest! They are not criticising you personally, they are just identifying ways that they think you could make your work better. Getting criticism is not easy for anyone (that I’ve met anyway!) and is something that academics struggle with (ask your supervisor how they coped with their last rejection letter for a journal!). All supervisors want the best for their students, and they want to work with you to make you produce the best work when you can.

8.    You cannot have too many copies of your thesis - unless you have not labelled them clearly. You need to make sure you have it saved in multiple places - and you also need to make sure you have multiple versions. You don’t want to discover that the version you’ve carefully saved in six different places is corrupt, and the only version you have left is a month old . . . I used to save it with a new name (thesis date) each day, and then add a, b, c etc as I made major changes during the day. At the end of each day/week I’d go through and delete some copies so I didn’t have hundreds. It did mean that when I went to print out the final version and found it was corrupt, I didn’t have a complete meltdown (note the emphasis on complete!).

9.   There are lots of books/articles/blogs about how to ‘do’ a thesis. While many of these are incredibly valuable, remember that this is your journey, so you need to make it work for you. I found, for example, that I write better later in the day, so started off with more mechanical tasks, like checking referencing, or making changes, rather than launching into writing. Others write best first, so need to do that. Experiment and see what works best for you - there is no one right way to do it, but you might find that what you thought would/wouldn’t work actually works really well.

10.  And finally, enjoy it! This is supposed to be fun! Well, it should be enjoyable anyway :-) This is something you’ve chosen to do, and while it can and will drive you (and all those around you) completely up the wall at times, keep reminding yourself of why you wanted to do it in the first place - or plan the huge party you’ll have once it’s done! As part of this, make sure you take advantage of the opportunities you get as research students - the workshops, social events etc - especially if they are free! Just remember not to spend all your time on these. Do balance your time though - your doctorate should be like a job - so you are allowed (and definitely need) to take time off. Make sure you take breaks, and the odd holiday - and don’t spend all your time off thinking about it.

So what is the point of all this? Hopefully to introduce myself to you, to make you feel like you’re not alone,  and can come to me with questions, and maybe give you some ideas about how you might go about this weird business of doing a thesis and remain (relatively) sane. I look forward to hearing about everyone’s journeys - and celebrating your graduations!


Friday, August 1, 2014

Tracy Skelton @ Children as Social Actors network - collective notes

by Kim Brown, Tracy Rogers, and Lara Sanderson
 
These notes are an assemblage of our recollections of the discussion today - 1st Auust, 2014

·      Ethics committee are mindful of the issues faced by schools, who are being saturated by research requests. The flip side for researchers is finding willing participants amongst schools to partner with for research. Schools outside Dunedin also face numerous research requests from large-scale research projects.
·      Raises the question of how useful research might be for schools. We should be considering what participants might gain from our research. Is research intended to benefit participants or PBRF-driven?
·      In the UK currently, publically funded research must indicate and then report on the impact of the research. This system of accountability is favouring research that has demonstrable outcomes.
·      Children are often keen to get involved in research and many in the group have found children agentic in expressing when they do not wish to reply/continue participating. Offering children a range of verbal and non-verbal cues can support their voicing their withdrawal.
·      Parents/schools are often supportive of children participating in research because of the opportunities/learning participation offers.
·      Participation in research can place enormous time pressures on children, who may already have busy lives.
·      Research activities do not always take into consideration the varying abilities of the children involved (despite them being similar ages), nor are always age-appropriate. Take into consideration children’s varying abilities and build flexibility into the ethics application and research design.
·      Research activities may also place considerable demands on parents, who are required to support their children with research activities, transportation, appointments and so on.
·      Parents/carers and schools as gatekeepers – involving parents in the early planning stages of research design may help eliminate gatekeeping further down the track (although may displace children as being recognised as competent social actors).
·      Ethics application – how much are postgraduate students engaging with the document rather than the process of thinking through the process of building ethical relationships and conduct..
·      Ethical engagement in research is a two-way process and sometimes researchers are subject to questionable behaviour from participants. Requires ongoing consideration and learning.
·      Participant information and consent forms are not always culturally appropriate and reflect procedural ethics rather than ethics in practice. Researchers should argue for alternatives in their ethics application and provide a rationale for different approaches.
·      Perhaps the consent could include more statements with a positive orientation towards participation rather than repetition of the right to withdraw.
·      Researchers should see the ethics application as an open or honest conversation.
·      Tokens of appreciation: there seems to be a trend towards larger tokens being offered around Dunedin. Tokens need to be more age-appropriate and consideration shown that the token does not disadvantage or generate a cost for the family (eg. a movie ticket for children too young to watch a movie without an adult).
·      Ethical dilemmas presented by a duty of care towards participants
·      Suggestion that one place on the ethics committee could be reserved for staff call up to (like jury summons)

Post-grad discussion
To support a shift in thinking from the ethics application being merely procedural, to a situation where the ethics application is an aspect of ethics in practice, should postgraduate students undertake a compulsory paper or course in ethics? Is the supervision process enough to foster deepening understanding of research ethics?